Throughout history, humans have relied on natural resources, notably clay minerals, for medicinal purposes. Indigenous communities across the globe have traditionally employed mineral-rich clays extensively for wound care, infection prevention, and skin health management. These healing practices, passed down over generations, reflect an empirical yet sophisticated understanding of clay’s therapeutic properties, particularly its antimicrobial potential.1–4 Modern scientific research has validated these longstanding traditional applications, confirming that specific clay minerals exhibit substantial antimicrobial activity, effective even against antibiotic-resistant pathogens.5–8 Among clays studied extensively for their medical potential, bentonite (montmorillonite) and kaolinite stand out for their distinct mineralogical compositions and demonstrated efficacy in antimicrobial applications.9,10 The increasing global threat of antibiotic resistance, coupled with limited innovation in conventional antibiotics, underscores the urgent need to identify novel antimicrobial agents.11,12 Clay-based therapies have consequently emerged as attractive alternatives or adjuncts to traditional antimicrobial treatments. Despite promising preliminary evidence, significant gaps in the research remain, particularly regarding the standardization of clay mineral composition, comprehensive clinical evaluations, and the development of appropriate regulatory frameworks necessary for medical application.13,14 By synthesizing Indigenous medicinal knowledge with contemporary dermatological and microbiological research, this literature review aims to provide a comprehensive examination of the antimicrobial properties and therapeutic potential of bentonite and kaolinite. Specifically, this review will summarize current scientific evidence regarding the antimicrobial effectiveness of these clays, analyze the mechanisms underlying their antibacterial activity, and explore the integration of traditional medicinal practices with modern research methodologies. Ultimately, the goal of this review is to critically assess the current state of clay-based antimicrobial treatments, highlighting their potential roles and future directions in dermatology, wound care, infection control, and global antimicrobial stewardship efforts.
A narrative literature review was conducted to evaluate the antimicrobial properties of bentonite (montmorillonite) and kaolinite. Peer-reviewed publications, ethnobotanical records, and microbiological studies were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science. The search strategy employed Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keyword-based queries, including: Antimicrobial clay,” “Bentonite antibacterial properties,” “Kaolinite antimicrobial effects,” “Montmorillonite and bacterial inhibition,” “Indigenous medicine and clay-based wound healing,” “Natural antimicrobials in dermatology,” “Clay-based treatments for antibiotic-resistant bacteria,” Boolean operators (“AND,” “OR”) were applied to refine search results. Filters were used to exclude non-English studies, duplicate publications, and articles unrelated to antimicrobial properties.
The selection of studies was based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure scientific rigor and relevance. Inclusion Criteria: Experimental studies (in vitro, in vivo, or clinical trials) evaluating the antimicrobial activity of bentonite, kaolinite, or montmorillonite. Studies investigating mechanisms of action, including metal ion release, pH modulation, adsorption of bacterial toxins, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Clinical research assessing the efficacy of clay-based wound healing applications. Ethnographic and anthropological studies documenting Indigenous medicinal uses of clay. Exclusion Criteria: Studies focusing on non-antimicrobial properties of clay. Research examining clay types outside of those under review, unless discussing mixed clay compositions relevant to antimicrobial activity. Articles lacking experimental validation of antibacterial effects. Studies with insufficient methodological rigor, including anecdotal reports without scientific evaluation.
Data Extraction and Analysis Data extraction was performed to categorize selected studies based on the following parameters: Clay type: Bentonite, kaolinite. Bacterial species tested:
Clay minerals, notably bentonite (montmorillonite) and kaolinite have been valued historically for their antimicrobial and therapeutic potentials, used in human healthcare from ancient civilizations to contemporary biomedical applications. These clays are composed of diverse minerals, predominantly carbonates, silicates, and hydrated oxides of iron and aluminum, which contribute significantly to their antimicrobial efficacy and therapeutic utility.4,5,15
Historically, medicinal clays date back to the Mesopotamian, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman civilizations. The earliest documented use of therapeutic clays appears in ancient Mesopotamian texts and Egyptian papyri, where clays were applied to treat skin ailments, infections, ulcers, and wounds.1,2 Notably, “Lemnian earth,” primarily composed of kaolinite, was famously utilized in Ancient Greece as an antidote for poisons, to cure ulcers, and to treat dysentery.16 During the Medieval and Renaissance periods, medicinal clays continued to be widely employed across Europe, and documented in influential pharmacopeias.2,16 In the modern era, the renewed scientific interest in these natural materials has been spurred by cases such as the successful use of French green clays (rich in iron-smectite) to treat Buruli ulcer, a severe necrotizing fasciitis caused by
Microbiological investigations revealed these clays exhibit broad-spectrum antibacterial properties. Importantly, the antimicrobial mechanisms identified were not physical, such as adsorption alone, but chemical, involving metal-ion exchanges and redox-sensitive reactions. Adsorption refers to the adherence of the molecules from one medium onto the surface of the other while absorption refers to the pulling of molecules from one medium directly into another.17 Progressive thermal treatments and cation exchange experiments demonstrated that these antibacterial properties were closely linked to exchangeable metal ions and redox-active elements, suggesting that the pH and oxidation states mediated by clay mineral surfaces significantly impact bacterial viability.6,9
Bentonite is characterized by a 2:1 layered structure with significant swelling capabilities, high surface area, and strong adsorptive and absorptive properties, contributing notably to its antimicrobial efficacy.4,5 Kaolinite, a 1:1 layered clay mineral, historically revered for medicinal applications, typically exhibits limited intrinsic antimicrobial activity. Nevertheless, kaolinite’s exceptional adsorption capacity allows it to remove and immobilize harmful microbes, toxins, and other substances.10,15,16
Despite numerous benefits, both bentonite and kaolinite carry certain health risks due to their potent adsorptive properties. Persistent inhalation, ingestion, or dermal absorption of these clays may result in the uptake of toxic elements, including heavy metals. For example, chronic exposure through soil (as seen with podoconiosis, associated with red volcanic clays) can result in severe dermatologic and systemic health complications.13 Thus, the therapeutic use of clays necessitates controlled preparation and adherence to stringent regulatory standards to mitigate potential toxicity.
Overall, the historical and contemporary significance of bentonite and kaolinite underlines their therapeutic potential and broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. Recognizing their complex chemical interactions and dual nature—therapeutic yet potentially hazardous—is essential for harnessing their full medical and pharmaceutical potential.
Bentonite and kaolinite are among the most extensively studied medicinal clays with growing relevance in dermatology and wound care. Their distinct mineral structures, ion exchange capacities, and physicochemical behaviors influence their relative antimicrobial efficacies in treating dermatologic infections and inflammatory skin conditions (Table 1).
Bentonite, composed largely of the smectite mineral montmorillonite, is characterized by a 2:1 layered silicate structure that enables high cation exchange capacity, swelling behavior, and surface reactivity. These factors underpin its broad-spectrum antimicrobial effects. In vitro studies demonstrate strong bactericidal activity against
Kaolinite is a 1:1 silicate clay with low cation exchange capacity and no significant swelling behavior. While it possesses minimal intrinsic bactericidal action, its adsorptive capacity supports skin barrier repair in inflammatory dermatoses.4,13,15
Kaolinite has historically been used in dermatology as a base for masks and poultices for skin detoxification and seborrhea. Its efficacy improves when functionalized with antimicrobial agents. In a recent study, kaolinite impregnated with silver and zinc oxide nanoparticles demonstrated potent antimicrobial activity against
Side-by-side comparison of bentonite and kaolinite based on mineral group, physicochemical behavior, antimicrobial mechanisms, functionalization potential, and proposed dermatologic applications.
Feature
Bentonite
Kaolinite
Mineral Group
Smectite (2:1)
Kaolin (1:1)
Swelling Capacity
High
Minimal
Cation Exchange Capacity
High
Low
Metal Ion Release
Yes (Fe, Cu, Zn)
Limited
ROS Generation
Significant
Negligible
Antimicrobial Activity
Strong, broad-spectrum
Weak to moderate
Proposed Dermatologic Use
MRSA, chronic wounds, acne
Seborrhea, topical detoxification
Functionalization Potential
Excellent (nanocomposites)
High (as carrier of Ag/ZnO)
Biocompatibility
High
High
While bentonite exhibits intrinsic antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activity, making it a promising candidate for wound dressings, hemostatic agents, and acne therapies, kaolinite plays a more adjunctive role serving as a biocompatible carrier and toxin-absorbing agent in dermatologic formulations.
The medical literature describes two primary mechanisms by which clays may exert their effects: 1) physical adherence and 2) chemical reactions.
The physical properties of clay have been observable both in ancient cultures and modern society - of note, their structure and ability to both absorb and adsorb impurities. The structure of these clays itself is of novel importance. Certain textures, such as fibrous needles can disrupt microbial cell membranes.20 This propensity of clays to create a physical, surface attraction between itself and bacteria can have novel bactericidal properties.17 Bentonite’s antimicrobial efficacy is mediated by physical adsorption of bacterial toxins, reducing virulence and inflammation.6,7,21,22 Kaolinite’s adsorptive capacity allows it to sequester inflammatory mediators, microbial toxins, and wound exudates.
These inherent properties are due in part to the small sizes of clays coupled with their asymmetric particle shapes. Collectively, this provides clays with an increased surface area, making adhesion to the surface of the skin a desirable quality in their utilization in wound care. In this manner, these clays can disrupt the ability of bacterial species to both passively and actively uptake nutrients. By doing so, there is a loss of integrity in the bacterial cellular envelopes in addition to the inability to transport metabolites, resulting in the accumulation of toxic compounds.13
Another method in which clays may demonstrate antibacterial activity is through chemical reactions. Due to the profound effect of clays to both absorb and adsorb that which they come into contact with, these clays can also be inundated with elements and minerals ubiquitous in the environment.4 Though this may vary considerably depending on the type of clay and location, they are typically impregnated with metallic ions, such as silver, copper, zinc, chromium, mercury, thallium, iron, aluminum, bismuth, silicon, and cadmium. Importantly, this provides these clays with novel bacteriostatic and/or bactericidal properties as cationic exchanges between the bacteria and clay can result in a derangement (and in some cases, arrest) of bacterial metabolism.23
Bentonite’s antimicrobial efficacy is mediated by the following chemical mechanisms:
In addition to the endogenous release of these metals, clays also demonstrate antibacterial activity through lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress, which increase microbial membrane permeability. The production of intracellular hydroxyl radicals (formed during the Fenton reaction - the oxygenation of Fe2+) is effective in degrading protein and DNA.20 The chemical properties of clays can prove to be useful in creating toxic environments for pathogenic microorganisms.13
While the combination of these attributes holds promising prospects in terms of clinical applications, it becomes imperative to consult the literature to inquire whether clays have shown efficacy against different types of microbial agents. In regard to the innate immune system, certain varieties of clay, namely sepiolite and palygorskite, have demonstrated antimyeloperoxidase activity, leading to the inhibition of neutrophil migration and edema. These properties are further facilitated by the low-genotoxicity of these clays on somatic and germ cells.24
A study performed by
In terms of wound healing, clays rich in silica can help stimulate collagen synthesis topically by acting as a catalyst in enzyme hydroxylation.24 In both the past and present, silver ions have been useful as an antibacterial agent with added significance to its low cost, efficacy in smaller concentrations, and safer drug profile.23 In conjunction with their anti-inflammatory and antibacterial properties, these clays have potential medical applications in wound dressings, where both silica and silver can be incorporated.
Such innovations provide an alternative form of treatment for bacterial infections, especially as antibiotic resistance becomes increasingly common. Multidrug-resistant strains of
Kaolinite and bentonite clays have shown considerable promise in various dermatologic applications, including wound healing, hemostasis, treatment of skin infections and acne, and drug delivery.
Kaolinite is currently used clinically in products such as QuikClot Combat Gauze for hemostasis, Kerodex 51 as a barrier cream, and in sunscreens for its protective properties.27 Clay-based nanocomposite hydrogels represent a class of materials for next-generation wound dressings due to their biocompatibility, moisture retention, antimicrobial action, and drug delivery capabilities. Kaolin, when combined with PVA polymer and penicillin-streptomycin, demonstrated effective antibacterial and hemostatic properties, along with positive swelling and absorption for wound applications. In comparison, bentonite used with chitosan or PVP polymers and silver sulfadiazine showed reduced toxicity, enhanced collagen deposition, and accelerated wound healing. Specifically, bentonite–chitosan–silver sulfadiazine nanocomposites exhibited strong bactericidal effects against
In a separate in vivo burn wound model utilizing Yucatan minipigs, a bentonite clay complex demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects, enhanced angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and improved collagen production, factors that collectively promote wound healing.29
The use of clays for treating skin infections has also been explored through their role as carriers for antibiotics such as tetracycline and doxycycline. In one study, clay–antibiotic formulations effectively adsorbed and released these drugs, demonstrating antibacterial activity against
Another investigation assessed the antibacterial properties of natural and ion-exchanged clays— specifically kaolinite, two types of montmorillonite, and illite—in MRSA-infected wounds in mice models. Ion-exchanged illite clays exhibited the strongest antibacterial activity.31 The study highlights the variability in antibacterial efficacy among natural clays and suggests the potential to harness specific clay properties in standardized topical treatments for superficial infections.
In another study, salicylic acid was successfully incorporated into bentonite to create a nanocomposite suitable for dermatologic use. The bentonite–salicylic acid composite was found to be biocompatible, demonstrated low skin toxicity, and allowed for a delayed release of salicylic acid, enabling longer-lasting therapeutic effects.32
A clinical study conducted in Shanghai in 2023 evaluated a facial clay mask containing kaolin, bentonite, cellulobeads, thermal spring water, and vitamin B5 in a group of 75 adults with oily or combination skin. Over four weeks of twice-weekly use, participants experienced a statistically significant reduction in acne lesions and skin oiliness, and improved hydration and skin barrier function.33
Bentonite (montmorillonite) has also been studied for its potential use as a nanoclay drug delivery system in melanoma. In a study, doxorubicin was loaded into bentonite and it demonstrated sustained release over 21 days, supporting a role for local chemotherapy.34 An in vitro and in vivo xenograft mouse model measured melanoma cell proliferation, viability, and nanoclay adhesion after treatment with a bentonite/palygorskite nanoclay complex. In vitro, cell survival was reduced in all clay treatment groups in a dose-dependent manner, and atomic force microscopy revealed high nonspecific adhesion of the nanoclay complex to melanoma cells compared to melanocytes. In vivo, the tumors treated with the nanoclay complex were smaller, weighed less, and had lower mitotic activity and necrosis. The nanoclays proved not to be cytotoxic to healthy cells as well.35 Although the results are encouraging, further research including large-scale randomized clinical trials is necessary to confirm safety and efficacy in human populations.
The resurgence of interest in medicinal clays, especially bentonite and kaolinite, reflects a broader clinical and scientific effort to develop natural, sustainable antimicrobial agents. The results of this review demonstrate that these clay minerals, long used in traditional medicine, exhibit significant antimicrobial activity and may hold therapeutic promise in dermatologic settings, particularly in the treatment of skin infections, wound care, and inflammatory dermatoses (Table 2). However, translating their in vitro efficacy to clinical application requires overcoming challenges in standardization, toxicology, and formulation science.
An overview of representative studies included in the review, including clay type, microbial targets, experimental methods, mechanisms of action, and relevance to dermatology.
Williams et al, 200836
French Green Clay (Fesmectite)
Bentonite
In vitro
Broadspectrum antimicrobial activity via ion exchange and ROS
Fe-ion release,
Buruli ulcer, chronic wound infection
Behera et al, 202418
ZnO-bentonite nanocomposites
Bentonite
In vitro
Multidrug-
5-log reduction in bacterial count within
Zn-ion release, ROS
Acne, wound infections
Ogundipe et al, 202337
Kaolinite with
Kaolinite
In vitro
Strong antibacterial effect when functionalized
Metal nanoparticlemediated
Topical applications, detoxifying masks
Morrison et al, 20165
Smectite-rich medicinal clays
Primarily Bentonite
In vitro,
Antimicrobial activity tied to metal redox
Fe/Cu redox cycling, ROS generation
Chronic ulcers, infected wounds
Otto & Haydel, 20137
Mixed natural clays
Includes Bentonite
In vitro
Exchangeable
Ion exchange
Skin infections
Haydel et al, 200811
Montmorillonite -rich clays
Bentonite
In vitro
Broadspectrum antibacterial effects
Metal ion release, pH modulation
Acute and chronic skin infections
Bentonite’s physicochemical properties allow it to adsorb bacterial toxins and damage bacterial membranes. This mechanistic versatility makes bentonite particularly relevant for dermatologic conditions with biofilm involvement or chronic infection. In contrast, the antimicrobial action of Kaolinite is less pronounced but still clinically relevant. Kaolinite’s primary dermatologic utility lies in its strong adsorptive capabilities, allowing it to bind exudate, bacterial toxins, lipopolysaccharides, and moisture, which are factors important in wound management and skin barrier restoration.1,4 Kaolinite also serves as an effective carrier for antimicrobial agents. In addition to their individual antimicrobial roles, both bentonite and kaolinite can modulate the cutaneous microenvironment. Their inclusion in clay masks, topical pastes, and hydrocolloid dressings presents an opportunity for multifunctional treatment approaches; providing mechanical debridement, reducing microbial load, and soothing inflamed skin.
Despite these promising attributes, several obstacles remain that hinder the integration of clays into mainstream dermatologic therapy:
The therapeutic use of clay in dermatology is not novel. Historical texts such as the Ebers Papyrus describe clay as a treatment for skin infections, inflammation, and gastrointestinal disorders.2 Indigenous communities in Africa, South America, and Australia have long used clay for wound packing, burn treatment, and skin detoxification. Modern dermatologic science increasingly validates these empirical practices, particularly as antimicrobial resistance limits conventional treatment options.11 Recognizing and preserving traditional medicinal knowledge is vital, not only for ethical reasons but also for its potential to inform low-cost, culturally competent care strategies. Integrating Indigenous insights with current research may guide the selection of appropriate clay types, preparation techniques, and long-term safety considerations.
To translate laboratory findings into clinical dermatology, the following areas should be prioritized:
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) evaluating clay-based dressings for acne, chronic wounds, and atopic dermatitis;
Formulation Studies to optimize particle size, pH, viscosity, and loading of active antimicrobials;
Toxicologic Profiling of commercially available and field-sourced clays to determine heavy metal burdens;
Policy and Regulatory Development ensuring standardization and patient safety;
Ethnopharmacologic Collaboration with Indigenous communities to ethically incorporate ancestral practices.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this work. No external funding was received for the preparation of this manuscript.
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.