Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Complementary & Alternative Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review: Patient-reported outcomes collect vital information about the impact treatments have on quality of life. This article reviews patient-reported outcomes from trials of complementary and alternative therapies for atopic dermatitis.

Jiwon Park; Peter Lio, MD

doi:10.64550/joid.xpgfjg26

Review Article

06 Aug 2025

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Complementary & Alternative Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

Jiwon Park, Peter Lio, MD

Review Article

18 Mar 2025

Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Complementary & Alternative Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

Jiwon Park, Peter Lio, MD

Article Info

DOI:
10.64550/joid.xpgfjg26

Reviewed by:
Alex Means, MD, Steven Daveluy, MD

Abstract

# Relevance

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin condition with fluctuating severity. Physician-assessed AD tools are often reliant on a single visual snapshot that may be discordant with patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) offers potential adjunct therapies to standard AD management, but their effectiveness measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is limited.

# Objective

Our systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of CAM therapies in managing AD, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that incorporate PROMs as primary or secondary endpoints.

# Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for RCTs from March 2015 to March 2024. Studies included had to directly evaluate CAM interventions for AD, utilize at least one PROM, and be published in English.

# Results

Sixteen RCTs met the inclusion criteria. CAM therapies evaluated included acupuncture, topical oils (sunflower, coconut, and evening primrose), mind-body therapies (hypnosis, intermittent fasting, and mother-performed infantile massage), and bath additives (tannic acid, pine tar, paraffin, and emollient bath additives). Acupuncture demonstrated potential in reducing itch and improving quality of life, though efficacy varied. Topical oils showed promising results in reducing itch and AD severity. Mind-body therapies improved QoL metrics as well as AD symptoms. For bath additives, pine tar and tannic acid were effective in reducing AD severity, while paraffin and emollient additives showed mixed results.

# Conclusion

CAM therapies show potential in managing AD when assessed with PROMs, indicating improvements in PROs and quality of life. Further large-scale RCTs are needed to validate these findings and integrate CAM into AD management.

Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder characterized by cycles of intermittent exacerbations interspersed with periods of relative control.¹ Managing AD can be difficult due to its dynamicity: signs and symptoms of AD wax and wane over the course of years, months, and even days. Yet, many of the validated instruments used to evaluate AD control heavily rely on visual snapshots that reveal only a piece of the larger disease progression.² While the clinician-assessed measures are efficient in providing a succinct, visual characterization of AD in clinic visits, unfortunately, many of these tools, such as the often-used Investigator Global Assessment (IGA)³ and Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI),⁴ lack representation of a comprehensive overview of health-related quality of life (QoL) measures that are intricately tied to patient satisfaction.^5,6 Variables factored into physician-assessed clinical severity may be discordant with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).⁷ Thus, the increased incorporation of PROs in randomized clinical trials reflects clinicians’ understanding that successful AD control relies on treatments that effectively manage clinical signs of AD in addition to patient-reported symptoms, such as pruritus, pain, and sleep disturbances—all factors intricately tied to patient burden of AD.^8–10

Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are increasingly acknowledged as important instruments by physicians, regulators, and pharmaceutical companies for their importance in incorporating patient-centered data in clinical trials. In fact, they are often incorporated as primary or secondary endpoints in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The increasing emphasis on integrating PROs in AD clinical trials may improve patient adherence to treatment by focusing on patient needs and preferences that matter most in considering treatment options in the real-world.¹¹ The chronic, relapsing nature of AD lends itself to the prolonged use of conventional treatment options—ranging from topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, systemic immunomodulatory medications, and biologic agents. While these treatments may be effective, they are accompanied by potential side effects that may make them undesirable for certain patients.^12,13 Thus, complementary and alternative (CAM) approaches used in adjunct to conventional AD treatment may provide additional relief for patients. CAM therapies are often flexibly integrated into a patient’s lifestyle without temporal restrictions that limit many traditional AD therapies.¹⁴ Despite the widespread use of CAM therapies by AD patients, there is a lack of RCTs that assess the efficacy of integrative approaches with PROMs.¹⁵ Thus, this review aims to evaluate CAM therapies through RCTs that used PROMs in AD management.

Materials and Methods

Following the guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses),¹⁶ a search of PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted from March 2015 to March 2024 to identify all RCTs investigating CAM approaches for AD management that used at least one PROM as a primary or secondary endpoint (Figure 1). Medical subject headings (MeSH) queried in the systematic search were atopic dermatitis, acupuncture, acupressure, sunflower, coconut, primrose, massage, hypnosis, bath, and tea. The PROMs that met inclusion criteria were the following: Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT),¹⁷ Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM),¹⁸ Patient-Oriented SCORing of Atopic Dermatitis (PO-SCORAD),¹⁹ Recap of Atopic Eczema (RECAP),²⁰ Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Score (PP-NRS),²¹ Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI),²² Short Form 12 (SF-12),²³ Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (pruritus, sleep disturbances/insomnia, etc).²⁴

Figure 1.

Description: PRISMA flow diagram.

RCTs that met inclusion and exclusion criteria were limited to studies published in the English language and those composed of at least ten or more human subjects. Trials excluded were RCTs that did not directly investigate CAM therapy as a primary intervention, published final outcomes, incorporated PROMs in study outcomes, lacked an accessible link, and published in a non-English language. A manual review of the titles and abstracts was conducted, and full texts of manuscripts were reviewed to determine eligibility.

Results

A total of 161 articles were identified in the initial search from Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (n = 136) and PubMed (n = 25). After 30 duplicate trials were removed, 115 studies were assessed for eligibility. The exclusion criteria were the following: irrelevance in directly investigating CAM therapy as a primary AD intervention (n = 91), did not progress to publication (n = 8), lacked at least one PROM to evaluate clinical efficacy in AD intervention (n = 6), lacked an accessible link (n = 5), and were not in the English language (n = 5). Sixteen trials met inclusion criteria and were evaluated in this review.

Acupuncture

A cornerstone of traditional Chinese medicine, acupuncture is increasingly recognized as a viable alternative therapy for managing AD. By inserting fine needles into specific points on the body, acupuncture promotes healing by ostensibly restoring balance of “qi”—the body’s vital energy.²⁵ In fact, acupuncture is shown to demonstrate immunomodulatory effects in reducing itch intensity by dampening allergen-induced basophil activation.²⁶ A commonly used acupuncture point called Large Intestine-11 (LI-11) reduced not only skin inflammation but also ameliorated serotonergic itch via blockade of 5-HT2 and 5-HT7 in murine models with induced AD skin.²⁷ Further, acupuncture in LI-11 attenuated scratching behavior, offering potential in breaking the itch-scratch cycle that perpetuates inflammation in AD.^28,29

Three RCTs on acupuncture met inclusion criteria. Park et al (n = 36) found that there were no significant differences across all indices in true acupuncture (TA) and sham acupuncture (SA) groups. While the TA group maintained SCORAD and EASI scores for at least 4 weeks during follow-up, there was no difference in PROMs–POEM, DLQI, VAS (pruritus), and VAS (insomnia). The authors hypothesized that acupuncture works through specific and non-specific effects, and the expectancy of treatment primarily responsible for the non-specific benefits of acupuncture was fulfilled by the sham treatment. However, the effects of acupuncture were sustained in TA during treatment and follow-up period. Compared to SA, TA SCORAD score substantially decreased 2 weeks after intervention and continually improved during the follow-up period (both p < 0.0001). The study was limited in its small sample size along with the patients’ baseline AD clinical severity (mild-to-moderate), requiring further RCTs to elucidate acupuncture treatment in AD.³⁰

Rotter et al conducted a three-armed RCT that compared acupuncture to osteopathic medicine and control. Acupuncture demonstrated a clinically relevant difference in VAS itching between control (p < 0.05) and decreased topical corticosteroid (TCS) use was noted. Interestingly, upon health economics analysis on the cost-effectiveness of acupuncture treatment defined by AD-related total costs (number of sick days, impaired work hours, and utilization of healthcare related to AD), acupuncture was not shown to be superior to osteopathic medicine nor control. While SCORAD or EASI revealed no differences, clinical improvement in itch supports acupuncture as an adjuvant therapy in managing AD.³¹

While the SCORAD between TA and SA was not significant (p = 0.089), Abad-Constantino similarly found that both TA and SA acupuncture groups showed reduction in VAS (pruritus) scores along with decreased TCS use. The true acupuncture group reported greater reductions (p = 0.009) sustained after the end of treatment, suggesting that acupuncture may serve as an effective adjuvant modality in controlling pruritus. The comparable efficacy of TA to SA may be attributed to the acupuncture needle stimulating the cutaneous A-gamma or C fibers that subsequently depletes the neurotransmitters mediating pruritus thus attenuating tachyphylaxis (p < 0.001).³² Moreover, the DLQI and CDLQI scores also revealed greater improvement in QoL in the TA group.³³

Acupuncture has been used to manage AD, and its efficacy has been demonstrated in multiple pruritic dermatoses, including prurigo nodularis,³⁴ uremic pruritus,³⁵ and neuropathic pruritus.³⁶ Pruritus is one of the most challenging AD burdens, impacting patients’ QoL with associations with anxiety, depression, difficulty concentrating, and decrease in sexual desire and function.³⁷ Thus, the three RCTs demonstrating the efficacy of acupuncture in alleviating pruritus along with AD severity may illustrate acupuncture as a promising adjunct treatment for patients seeking integrative approaches in achieving AD control.

Topical Oils

The history of using natural oils for broken skin dates back at least centuries, with various cultures incorporating plant-based oils into traditional remedies for skin conditions.³⁸ Ancient civilizations utilized oils for their moisturizing and soothing properties. It follows then that natural oils have been a popular CAM approach for AD, rooted in ancient practices that have been continually studied into the modern era.³⁹ Of the many topical oils, two RCTs on primrose oil, sunflower seed oil, and coconut oil met inclusion criteria.

Sunflower Seed Oil and Coconut Oil

Sunflower seed (Helianthus annus) oil is rich in linoleic acid, which has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties by serving as a precursor for prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) that drives cutaneous inflammation.⁴⁰ Further, sunflower oleodistillates (SOD) serve as a potent activator of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) that improves skin barrier by stimulating keratinocyte differentiation; in fact, Dubuqoy et al suggested that 2% SOD may demonstrate similar clinical efficacy to a mid-potency topical corticosteroid.⁴¹

Coconut (Cocos nucifera) oil is another botanical oil used as a CAM modality for AD management, thought to have both emollient and antimicrobial properties.⁴² In a study that compared coconut oil to mineral oil in children with AD, coconut oil was found to be superior to mineral oil with a 68% and 38% reduction in SCORAD respectively (p < 0.001).⁴³ Further, the refining process of virgin coconut oil (VCO) leaves behind only a tiny fraction of coconut protein, which appears to eliminate most of the likely candidates for triggering allergic reactions, rendering VCO a safe and efficacious option.⁴⁴

Nadora et al performed an RCT that compared isosorbide diesters (IDEAS, 4% isosorbide dicaprylate and 4% isosorbide disunflowerseedate) in sunflower seed oil and coconut oil with the control vehicle of 0.1% colloidal oatmeal. The IDEAs group reported a 65.6% improvement in their VAS (pruritus) score compared to the 43.8% reported in the vehicle group (p = 0.013). Moreover, the relative abundance of Staphylococcus aureus was decreased in the IDEAS group compared with the no change in the vehicle group (p = 0.044). The IDEAS group further noted improved AD clinical severity indicated by 56.5% of patients in IDEAS versus 25% in placebo control achieving EASI-75 scores by week 4 (p = 0.07).⁴⁵

Evening primrose oil

Evening primrose oil (EPO), derived from Oenothera biennis seeds, has garnered attention for its rich gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) content, a subtype of omega-6 fatty acid that is anti-inflammatory.⁴⁶ EPO has also been shown to inhibit the production of pro-inflammatory metabolites in the arachidonic acid pathway by upregulating PGE1, decreasing acute inflammation.⁴⁷ Chung et al conducted a RCT that compared EPO to soybean oil. While there was no significant difference in VAS (pruritus) scores, differential improvement of EASI depending on age was noted with EPO improving EASI scores in under age 12 (p = 0.002) but not in over age 12 (p = 0.481).⁴⁸

The improvements in AD clinical severity along with varying degrees of itch underscores that, while generally correlated, clinician-assessed outcomes may not always be concordant with patient-reported symptoms. With Nadora et al demonstrating itch reduction with sunflower seed oil and coconut oil (p = 0.013) use along with Chung et al finding improvements in AD severity in patients under age 12,^45,48 these topical oils can be easily integrated into patients’ standard AD management, especially to optimize care for patients with contraindications to other therapies, including pediatric patients, geriatric patients, and patients with numerous comorbidities. While the use of topical oils shows promise in AD management, further studies must be conducted to better characterize their benefits in integrative AD management.

Stress and Skin: Mind-Body Therapies

The skin not only responds to external stress but also reflects internal stressors impacting the body. When stress is perceived, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activates downstream expression of cortisol, which may decrease the immune response in chronic stress. Moreover, perceived stress may upregulate pruritogenic agents in the nervous system to lower the itch threshold, exacerbating the itch-scratch cycle that is the hallmark of AD.⁴⁹ Thus, mind-body therapies, such as hypnosis, biofeedback, massage, and meditation techniques have emerged to better combat the impact of stress on AD.⁵⁰

Hypnosis, Intermittent Fasting with Diet Changes, and Exercise

Hypnosis is a state of altered consciousness that can impact the perception of reality and physiologic responses.⁵¹ While the exact mechanism is yet to be uncovered, hypnosis has shown to modulate activation of specific regions of the brain through regional cerebral blood flow.⁵² Hypnosis has been used for a wide range of dermatologic conditions via positive suggestions, but RCTs that demonstrate clinical efficacy of hypnosis in AD are sparse.

Rotter et al designed a RCT (n = 17) that compared hypnotherapy group program (HTP), intermittent fasting with diet adjustment group program (IFDP), and an exercise program that served as a control. Due to COVID-19, recruitment was limited and the in-person HTP sessions had to be flexibly readjusted as self-administered HTP. Despite the circumstances, HTP (n = 6) showed improvement in VAS pruritus, VAS sleep disturbances, DLQI, SF-6, and SF-12, although the improvement was not always consistent through the 24 week mark.⁵³ While Rotter et al were limited in study scale due to the pandemic, they uncovered promising results in HTP that mirrored a RCT conducted by Stewart et al, which demonstrated improvements in itching, sleep disturbances, and mood in severe, recalcitrant AD up to two years.⁵⁴ Overall, the study elucidates the potential of hypnotherapy as an adjuvant mind-body therapy, but further large-scale studies must be conducted.

Mother-performed Infantile Massage

Mother-performed infantile massage (MPIM) has been proven to not only reduce the relapse rates of AD but also provide mental health benefits to the caretaker providing the massage.⁵⁵ In a three-armed RCT in full-term infants (AD infants with MPIM, AD infant control, and healthy infant control), Lin et al. reported improvement in EASI (p < 0.001) and relapse rate (p < 0.01) in AD infants with MPIM vs. AD infants control. Further, AD infants that received MPIM showed improvement in IDQOL (p < 0.001).⁵⁶ Thus, given the ease and flexibility of performing MPIM, MPIM has great potential to serve as an adjuvant treatment that can be performed when applying emollients as part of the standard AD therapy.

Mind-body therapies have demonstrated immense potential in alleviating symptoms that burden patients the most. MPIM may help mediate neuropsychiatric comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders, that are commonly associated with pediatric AD.⁵⁷ Further, MPIM may be superior to relaxation therapy in pediatric patients due to compliance, reduced peripheral vasoconstriction secondary to vagal stimulation and decreased stress, and its demonstrated effects on itch. Schachner et al conducted a landmark RCT that found improvement in the focal areas for AD measures (redness, lichenification, scaling, excoriation, and pruritus) as well as global areas for AD (scaling and excoriation) (p < 0.05), establishing MPIM as an effective approach for pediatric patients and caregivers.⁵⁸ Thus, mind-body therapies may confer a bidirectional benefit by mediating the psychocutaneous interplay in AD, improving patient well-being and QoL as well as AD symptoms.

Bath Additives

Prior to the advent of modern therapeutics for AD, bath additives have been long studied for AD. In the late 19th century, Hebra recommended a frequent bathing regimen of up to three to four times daily; later, this view was challenged in the mid-20th century by Sholtz who hypothesized bathing to be harmful for AD skin.^59,60 To this day, bathing regimens and additives serve as a popular integrative approach. Our search yielded four types of bath additives, consisting of tannic acid (TA), pine tar, paraffin, and emollient additives.

Tannic Acid

TA is a type of polyphenol, a class of compounds with antioxidant properties found in various plants, including grapes and Camellia sinensis.^61,62 Used in traditional medicines for centuries, a study on AD murine models found that TA displayed therapeutic benefits in AD by suppressing angiogenesis and thymus and activation regulated chemokine (TARC) expression, decreasing Th2 cytokines.⁶³ Further, TA inhibits nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling by inducing PPAR-γ protein, subsequently decreasing inflammation that drives AD immunopathophysiology.⁶² In a RCT that met inclusion criteria, Takahagi et al compared TA- and placebo-bath additives with the VAS (pruritus) score as an endpoint. For both TA and placebo-bath additives, patients in the overall cohort reported an improvement in pruritus in all observed periods of the morning and afternoon. Both cohorts showed comparable efficacy in controlling pruritus, which the researchers attributed to the placebo’s vehicle effect (no TA included with sodium sulfate, malic acid, sodium glutamate, and uranine). Interestingly, when the analysis was confined to patients with mild-to-moderate AD, TA showed a significant improvement in pruritus at night compared with placebo. Considering that no contact dermatitis or serious adverse effects were noted in the RCT, TA may serve as a safe alternative to use adjuvant in mild-to-moderate patients.⁶⁴

Pine Tar

Pine tar is another commonly utilized CAM modality used to treat skin conditions like AD, psoriasis, and dermatitis due to its properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) that exhibit anti-inflammatory effects and antiseptic effects.⁶⁵ In a 3-month investigator-blinded, crossover, RCT (n = 43), Ng et al found significant improvement in measured indices: total SCORAD (p = 0.0024), objective SCORAD (p = 0.011), extent (p = 0.014), intensity (p = 0.032), pruritus (p = 0.047), POEM (p = 0.044), SA colonization status (p = 0.035), and log-transformed IgE level (p = 0.028). Specifically, improvements in the POEM scores were shown in pine-tar bathing but not the vehicle oil in both the intention to treat analysis (p = 0.004) and per protocol (p = 0.044) analysis.⁶⁶

Paraffin

Paraffin provides a protective occlusive layer to prevent transepidermal water loss, which may help augment the skin barrier dysfunction in AD.⁶⁷ However, one study found that simple paraffin repleted the skin’s natural moisturizing factor.⁶⁸ Mixed results in literature warrant a RCT to elucidate the role of paraffin in AD management. Thus, Waked et al conducted a 12-week parallel-group, active-control, RCT (n = 52) in chronic hand eczema patients. The treatment group yielded greater improvement in SCORAD scores (28.6% versus 0.41%), and the patient-reported DLQI scores aligned with physician-assessed AD severity (60% versus 3.8%).⁶⁹ While further studies are needed to better characterize the efficacy of paraffin, there is encouraging evidence that paraffin may be a cost-effective method in improving QoL measures, including itching and sleep disturbances, paralleled by improvements in AD severity.

Emollient Bath Additives

Emollient bath additives are a broad umbrella term that includes the aforementioned ingredients. Commonly prescribed in general practices for pediatric AD patients, there is a dearth in comprehensive RCTs that evaluate the emollient additives’ efficacy. Thus, the BATHE trial sought to elucidate the practical clinical benefits of AD through a multicenter, pragmatic, parallel group RCT (n = 483) in the United Kingdom with the POEM score as its primary outcome. The intervention group was provided with three commonly prescribed emollient additives: Oilatum (Glaxoine; 63% light liquid paraffin); Balneum Almirall; 85% soya oil); or Aveeno (Johnson & Johnson). After 16 weeks, POEM scores were 0.41 higher in the treatment versus control group, which was lower than the 3-point clinically important difference in the POEM scale. While emollient additives were found to confer no clinical benefits, standard AD treatment was encouraged in both groups, such as soap avoidance and leave-on emollients.⁷⁰

Pine tar and paraffin were both successful in alleviating pruritus and AD severity, while the larger scale BATHE trial concluded no clinical benefits compared to standard AD management without emollient bath additives. Considering bath additives are a heterogeneous group of ingredients, further studies may help uncover clinical benefits as well as patient-reported symptoms of adjunct bath additive use.

Discussion

PROMs incorporate a unique viewpoint that has traditionally been overlooked in RCTs: the patient’s perspective. Especially in a chronic, relapsing condition like AD, PROMs are invaluable tools to integrate signs and symptoms of AD that pragmatically impact patients the most. The most assessed patient-reported symptoms were itch and sleep disturbances. In fact, itch was included as an outcome in all RCTs evaluated either as a PROM or incorporated through a non-PROM tool. Moreover, mind-body therapies demonstrate the most promising potential in alleviating PROs by improving AD-related symptoms in addition to comorbid psychiatric symptoms.

While almost half of AD patients flexibly utilize CAM approaches to manage their condition,⁷¹ due to the extensive realm of CAM that can encompass almost anything under the sun, there is a lack of comprehensive studies that thoroughly evaluate these approaches. Yet, the dearth of evidence-based knowledge does not negate its efficacy. Rather, it signals towards more studies that critically evaluate CAM modalities to increase patient options in AD management and ultimately improve AD treatment outcomes and patients’ QoL. Thus, future large-scale studies are needed to better characterize the benefits of these integrative approaches in AD management.

270398 Table 1. Acupuncture

Weeks and 12	Treatment	Intervention	Study Design	Patients (n)	Weeks	PROM Tools Used	Other Clinician-Assessed Tools	Results	Adverse effects (AEs)
Abad-Constantino et al³³	Standard of care with or without acupuncture	-SA or TA twice weekly with end of treatment (week 12) and follow-up period (week 20)-TA: itch-specific points (LI-4, LI-11, GB-31, and ST-26) manually stimulated with muscle twitch-SA: needles for non-itch specific points (PC-6, LI-10, ST-38, and SP-6) without manual stimulation and muscle twitch	Ran, sc, db, two arms	30	20	VAS (pruritus), DLQI	SCORAD, CDLQI, Global assessment (patient-reported), amount of concomitant medication use	-Improved mean reduction of VAS (pruritus) by end of treatment: TA 5.24 vs. SA 3.76 (p = 0.009). Sustained post-treatment.-Improved Global Assessment of Itch (Patient-Reported): TA vs SA at 12 weeks and 20 weeks (p = 1, p = 0.043).-Improved DLQI/CDLQI across time vs. between groups for TA and SA (p < 0.001, p = 0.34)-SCORAD: TA vs. SA across time and between groups (p < 0.001, p = 0.089)	No serious AEs
Park et al³⁰	Standard of care treatment in patients with mild to moderate AD with or without acupuncture	-SA or TA twice weekly with end of treatment (week 4) and follow-up period (week 8)-TA: Acupuncture points LI-11, ST-36, and PC-6 with additional personalized acupoints (ST-43, GB-41, LI-2, TE-3, SI-3, TE-6, SI-2, BL-66, LR-3, and SP-3).-SA: Six fixed control points (1 cm proximal and 1 cm medial to LI-11; 1 cm proximal and 1 cm lateral to ST-36; and 1–2 cm proximal and 1 cm medial to LI-7, BI) without needle insertion or manipulation	Ran, sc, db, two arms	36	8	POEM, DLQI, VAS (pruritus), VAS (insomnia)	SCORAD, EASI	-Improved mean change in SCORAD at post-intervention, 4 weeks: TA -11.83 vs. SA 0.45 (p < 0.0001)-Improved mean change in SCORAD at 4-week follow-up: TA 21.5 vs. SA 34.06 (p = 0.0006)-TA and SA improved all indices within each group over time.-No statistical significance observed in TA vs. SA in VAS (pruritus), VAS (insomnia), POEM, and DLQI scores pre- and post-intervention	No serious AEs
Rotter et al³¹	ACU vs. OM vs. standard therapy for AD	-ACU: Received eight semi standardized, 30-min sessions for every 1-2 weeks. LI-4 and LI-11 (BI); SP-6 and SP10 (UNI/BI) were stimulated.-OM: Received five, 45-min semi standardized OM treatments every 2 weeks at the cervical column, thoracic column, ribs, diaphragm, lungs, intestines, cranial bones and cranial fascia.	Ran, nb, three arms	121	26	DLQI, SF-12, VAS (pruritus), VAS (sleep disturbances), VAS (skin condition)	SCORAD, EASI, patient diaries (noted sleep disturbances), TCS use, Total costs (EUR)	-Improved VAS (pruritus): ACU 27.9 vs. control 42.3 (p < 0.05)-No difference in TCS use: ACU 1.9 vs. OM 4.3 (p = 0.10)-No difference in SCORAD: ACU 1.4 vs. OM -2.7 (p = 0.96)- ACU improved itching but not clinical AD severity-Lacked cost-effectiveness in ACU vs. OM with QALYs (n = 87) and costs (n = 90)	No serious AEs. Minor incidents in ACU (n = 17, 48.6%) and OM (n = 25, 64.1%)

AD atopic dermatitis, BI Bilateral, BL Bladder, contr controlled, db double blinded, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, GB Gallbladder, LI Large Intestine, LR Liver, nb nonblinded, OM Osteopathic medicine, PC pericardium, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, QALY Quality-Adjusted Life Year, ran randomized, SA sham acupuncture, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, SF-12 Short Form 12, SI Small Intestine, SP spleen, ST stomach, TA true acupuncture, TCS topical corticosteroid use, TE Triple Energizer, UNI Unilateral, VAS visual analog scale.

270399 Table 2. Topical Oils

References	Treatment	Intervention	Study Design	Patients (n)	Weeks	PROM Tools Used	Other Clinician-Assessed Tools	Results	Adverse effects (AEs)
Chung et al⁴⁸	Evening Primrose Oil (EPO) in mild AD	-EPO: 450 mg of EPO (40 mg of GLA) per capsule-Placebo control: 450 mg of soybean oil per capsule	Ran, db, pc, two arms	50	4 months	VAS (pruritus)	EASI, TEWL, blood IgE, and skin hydration	-Improved EASI: EPO vs. pc (p = 0.010)-Differential improvement of EASI depending on age: EPO vs. pc improved in under age 12 (p = 0.002) but no change in over age 12 (p = 0.481)-VAS (pruritus): EPO 3.8 vs. pc 4.3 (p = 0.714)-TEWL: forearms (EPO -3.05 vs. pc -1.60; p = 0.714) and cheeks (EPO -1.63 vs. pc -0.44; p = 0.714)-Skin hydration: forearms (EPO 6.57 vs. pc 3.03; p = 0.470) and cheeks (EPO 2.76 vs. pc 2.30; p = 0.920)-No significant improvement in itch, TEWL, and skin hydration, but improved AD severity (EASI) in under age 12	No AEs reported
Nadora et al⁴⁵	Topical Coconut vs. Sunflower Seed Oil-Derived Isosorbide Diesters (IDEAs) on AD	-IDEAS:, 4% isosorbide dicaprylate and 4% isosorbide disunflowerseedate) along with 0.1% colloidal oatmeal-pc: 0.1% colloidal oatmeal	Ran, db, vc, two arms	32	4	VAS (pruritus)	EASI-75, TCS use, Relative abundance of skin Staphylococcus aureus	-Improved VAS (pruritus): IDEAS 65.6% vs. pc 43.8% (p = 0.013)-EASI-75 at 4 weeks: IDEAS 56.5% vs. pc 25% (p = 0.07)-Decreased abundance of S. aureus: IDEAS vs. pc (p = 0.044)-Decreased TCS use at week 1: IDEAS 292.5% vs. pc 24.8% (p = 0.039)-IDEAS may improve pruritus, decrease TCS use, and decrease S. aureus colonization in AD	No serious AEs

AD atopic dermatitis, contr controlled, db double blinded, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, EPO Evening Primrose Oil, GLA Gamma-Linolenic Acid, IDEAs Isosorbide Diesters, pc placebo control, ran randomized, S. Aureus Staphylococcus Aureus, TEWL Transepidermal Water Loss, VAS visual analog scale, vc vehicle controlled.

270400 Table 3. Mind-body therapies

References	Treatment	Intervention	Study Design	Patients (n)	Weeks	PROM Tools Used	Other Clinician-Assessed Tools	Results	Adverse effects (AEs)
Lin et al⁵⁶	Standard of care with or without mother-performed infant massage (MPIM) on infantile eczema	-Data collected at baseline, 2-month (post-intervention), and 5-month (follow-up period)-Eczema with MPIM (EM) group (n = 33): once daily massage for six times/week for five months-Eczema control group (EC) (n = 33): routine care of eczema-Healthy control group (HC) (n = 31)	Ran, three arms	66	5 months	IDQOL	EASI, Caregiver mental health (SAS, SDS), Caregiver sleep state	-Improved infantile eczema clinical severity (EASI) and IDQOL of MPIM: EM vs EC (t = 3.953 and t = 3.793 respectively; p < 0.001 for both)-Improved caregiver mental health post-intervention: EM vs. EC (p = 0.003 for SAS; p = 0.002 for SDS)-Improved caregiver sleep state post-intervention: EM vs EC (t = 3.969, p < 0.001)-Increased complete remission and fewer relapses post-MPIM during 5-month follow-up: EM vs. EC (z = 3.124, p = 0.002)	No serious AEs reported
Rotter et al⁵³	Hypnotherapy (HPT), vs. Intermittent Fasting (IFDP) vs. Exercise Group Programs (EP) in mild-to-moderate AD	-Intervention terminated prematurely (16 weeks) before full recruitment due to COVID-19-HTP (n = 6): five-session hypnotherapy group program-IFDP (n = 4): five-session intermittent fasting with diet adjustment group program-EP (n = 1): five-session exercise group program-Control group (CG) (n = 9): no intervention	Ran, sc, oe, four arm	20	26	VAS (pruritus, sleep disturbances, skin conditions, and total), DLQI, SF-12	SCORAD, EASI, PANAS, Incapacity to work due to AD	-Limited intergroup comparisons due to COVID-19, but improvement seen in itch, AD clinical severity, and AD-specific QoL-VAS (pruritus) after 16 weeks: HTP 26.0 vs. IFDP 31.7 vs. EP 23.0 vs. CG 39.3-SCORAD after 16 weeks: HTP 24.1 vs. IFDP 29.1 vs. EP 49.1 vs. CG 25.5-SF-12 PCS and MCS after 16 weeks: HTP (55.0; 40.9) vs. IFDP (53.3; 50.9) vs. EP (50.2; 40.1) vs. CG (46.8; 50.0)	-No serious AEs noted

AD atopic dermatitis, CG control group, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, EASI Eczema Area and Severity Index, EC Eczema control group, EM Eczema with Mother-Performed Infant Massage, EP exercise group program, HC healthy control, HPT Hypnotherapy, IDQOL Impact of Dermatology Quality of Life, IFDP five-session intermittent fasting with diet adjustment group program, MPIM Mother-Performed Infant Massage, OE open explorative, PANAS Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, QoL Quality of Life, Ran randomized, RCT randomized controlled trial, SAS Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, SDS Self-Rating Depression Scale, SC single center, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, SF-12 Short Form 12, TCS topical corticosteroid use, VAS visual analog scale.

270401 Table 4. Bath additives

References	Treatment	Intervention	Study Design	Patients (n)	Weeks	PROM Tools Used	Other Clinician-Assessed Tools	Results	Adverse effects (AEs)
Takahagi et al⁶⁴	Standard of care with or without tannic acid (TA)-bath additives	-Cross-over (co) trial with TA-bath additive for two weeks followed by placebo-bath additive for two weeks; one week washout period in between-TA: (2.0% TA, 89.0% sodium sulfate, 5.0% malic acid, 4.0% sodium glutamate, and 0.03% uranine)-pc: no TA but 91.0% sodium sulfate, 5.0% malic acid, 4.0% sodium glutamate, and 0.03% uranine	Ran, db, co	21	5	VAS (pruritus)	Clinical symptom score of AD skin lesions	-Improvement in VAS (pruritus) in TA group: afternoon (pre-TA 4.98 vs. post-TA 3.95; p < 0.05) and night (pre-TA 5.18 vs. 3.98 post-TA; p < 0.05)-Improvement in VAS (pruritus) in pc group in afternoon: pre-pc 4.91 vs. post-pc 4.14 (p < 0.05)-No significant difference noted in TA vs. pc potentially due to vehicle effect	No AEs (including contact dermatitis) was reported
Santer et al⁷⁰	Standard of care with or without emollient bath additives for childhood eczema (BATHE trial)	-Emollient bath (EB) additives group (n = 264): regularly use commonly prescribed bath additives in the UK [Oilatum (Glaxo SmithKline; 63% light liquid paraffin); Balneum (Allmarall; 85% soya oil); or Aveeno (Johnson & Johnson)]; or other bath additives with no antimicrobial properties-No bath additives (pc) (n = 218): standard AD regimen	Ran, nb mc, superiority trial with two parallel groups	482	1 year	POEM	Number of eczema exacerbations, disease-specific quality of life (QoL) (Dermatitis Family Impact Questionnaire), generic QoL (Child Health Utility-9 Dimensions)	-Mean POEM over 16 weeks: EB 7.5 vs. pc 8.4 (p > 0.05)-After controlling for variables, POEM in pc was 0.41 points higher than EB (95% CI -0.27 to 1.10).-Adjusted mean POEM in <5 yrs.: EB was 1.29 (95% CI 0.33 to 2.24) higher than pc-Adjusted mean POEM in <5 yrs that bathe 5+ times/week in pc: baseline vs. 16 weeks showed 2.27 points higher (CI: 0.63 to 3.91)-EB yields no benefit over standard AD management.	No serious AEs reported
Ng et al⁶⁶	Standard of care with or without pine-tar (PT) bath in moderate to severe childhood eczema: an investigator-blinded, crossover, randomized clinical trial	-Participants bathed in PT or pc for one month with a one-month washout period in between-PT: pine-tar bath oil (active ingredient: pine-tar 2.3%)-pc: vehicle bath oil (paraffinum liquidum, laureth-3, and isopropyl myristate)	Ran, ib, co, two arms	39	3 months	POEM	SCORAD, QoL questionnaires, non-invasive skin biophysiological measurements, blood IgE levels, TEWL, SA colonization status, NESS, CDLQI, PADQLQ	-Improved AD metrics with PT bath using intention-to-treat analysis: total SCORAD (pre 33.3 vs. post 30.5; p = 0.030); POEM (pre 15.5 vs. post 12.7; p = 0.004); SA colonization status for no growth (pre 18 vs. post 28; p = 0.002); and log-transformed IgE level (pre 3.4 vs. post 3.2; p = 0.009)-No difference in SCORAD pruritus in PT: pre 6.1vs. post 5.2 (p = 0.054)-No difference in CDLQI in PT: pre 8.3 vs. 7.0 (p = 0.113)-PT bath was highly effective therapy to use adjuvant to standard AD management.	No serious AEs reported
Waked et al⁶⁹	Standard of care with or without paraffin bath for treatment of chronic hand eczema	-Paraffin group: paraffin bath therapy for 5 days/week for 12 weeks total with adjunct skin care measures (gloves, lifestyle changes, and emollients)-pc: skin care measures only-Measurements at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks	Ran, ib, ac	52	12	DLQI	SCORAD	-Improvement in DLQI: 6 weeks (paraffin 16 vs. pc 26; p = 0.001) and 12 weeks (paraffin 10 vs. pc 25; p = 0.001)-Improvement in objective SCORAD: 6 weeks (paraffin 51.65 vs. pc 66.92; p = 0.001) and 12 weeks (paraffin 40.62 vs. 66.88; p = 0.001)-Paraffin was effective in improving AD clinical disease and QoL.	No serious AEs noted

AD atopic dermatitis, ac active controlled, CDLQI Children’s Dermatology Life Quality Index, co cross-over, db double blinded, DLQI Dermatology Life Quality Index, EB emollient bath group, IDQOL Impact of Dermatology Quality of Life, ib investigator blinded, mc multi-centered trial, nb non-blinded, NESS Nottingham Eczema Severity Score, oe open explorative, PADQLQ Pediatric Allergic Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire, pc placebo control, POEM Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, PT pine tar, QoL Quality of Life, ran randomized, SA Staphylococcus aureus, sc single center, SCORAD SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, TA tannic acid, TEWL Transepidermal Water Loss, VAS visual analog scale.

Disclosures

Dr. Lio reports being on the speaker’s bureau for AbbVie, Arcutis, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Hyphens Pharma, Incyte, La Roche-Posay/L’Oréal, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre Dermatologie, Regeneron/Sanofi Genzyme, Verrica; reports consulting/advisory boards for Alphyn Biologics (stock options), AbbVie, Almirall, Amyris, Arcutis, ASLAN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Burt’s Bees, Castle Biosciences, Codex Labs (stock options), Concerto Biosci (stock options), Dermavant, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Lipidor, L’Oréal, Merck, Micreos, MyOR Diagnostics, Regeneron/Sanofi Genzyme, Sibel Health, Skinfix, Suneco Technologies (stock options), Theraplex, UCB, Unilever, Verdant Scientific (stock options), Verrica, Yobee Care (stock options). In addition, Dr. Lio has a patent pending for a Theraplex product with royalties paid and is a Board member and Scientific Advisory Committee Member emeritus of the National Eczema Association. Jiwon Park has no conflicts of interest or relationships to disclose.

Funding

This research received no funding.

References

1. Avena-Woods C.. "Overview of atopic dermatitis." Am J Manag Care, vol. 23, 2017, p. S115. DOI: .

2. Copley-Merriman C., Zelt S., Clark M., Gnanasakthy A.. "Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Dermatology Drug Development." Patient, vol. 10, 2017, p. 203. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-016-0196-6.
Google Scholar

3. Simpson E., Bissonnette R., Eichenfield L. F... "The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD): The development and reliability testing of a novel clinical outcome measurement instrument for the severity of atopic dermatitis." J Am Acad Dermatol, vol. 83, 2020, p. 839. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.04.104.
Google Scholar

4. Hanifin J. M., Thurston M., Omoto M., Cherill R., Tofte S. J., Graeber M.. "The eczema area and severity index (EASI): assessment of reliability in atopic dermatitis. EASI Evaluator Group." Exp Dermatol, vol. 10, 2001, p. 11. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2001.100102.x.
Google Scholar

5. Weldring T., Smith S. M. S.. "Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)." Health Serv Insights, vol. 6, 2013, p. 61. DOI: .

6. Cherrez-Ojeda I., Bousquet J., Giménez-Arnau A... "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Atopic Dermatitis and Chronic Urticaria Are Underused in Clinical Practice." J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, vol. 12, 2024, p. 1575. DOI: .

7. Charman C., Chambers C., Williams H.. "Measuring atopic dermatitis severity in randomized controlled clinical trials: what exactly are we measuring?." J Invest Dermatol, vol. 120, 2003, p. 932. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12251.x.
Google Scholar

8. Futamura M., Leshem Y. A., Thomas K. S., Nankervis H., Williams H. C., Simpson E. L.. "A systematic review of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) in atopic dermatitis (AD) trials: Many options, no standards." J Am Acad Dermatol, vol. 74, 2016, p. 288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.062.
Google Scholar

9. Snyder A. M., Chen S. C., Chren M. M... "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology." Am J Clin Dermatol, vol. 24, 2023, p. 499. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-023-00758-8.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

10. Drucker A. M., Wang A. R., Li W. Q., Sevetson E., Block J. K., Qureshi A. A.. "The Burden of Atopic Dermatitis: Summary of a Report for the National Eczema Association." J Invest Dermatol, vol. 137, 2017, p. 26. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.07.012.
Google Scholar

11. Karpen S. R., Klein A., Alloway R. R... "The Role of Patient-reported Outcomes and Medication Adherence Assessment in Patient-focused Drug Development for Solid Organ Transplantation." Transplantation, vol. 105, 2021, p. 941. DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003556.
Google Scholar

12. Aubert-Wastiaux H., Moret L., Le Rhun A... "Topical corticosteroid phobia in atopic dermatitis: a study of its nature, origins and frequency." Br J Dermatol, vol. 165, 2011, p. 808. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10449.x.
Google Scholar

13. Chu D.K., Chu A.W.L., Rayner D.G... "Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials." J Allergy Clin Immunol, vol. 152, 2023, p. 1493. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.030.
Google Scholar

14. Holm J. G., Clausen M. L., Agner T., Thomsen S. F.. "Use of Complementary and Alternative Therapies in Outpatients with Atopic Dermatitis from a Dermatological University Department." Dermatology, vol. 235, 2019, p. 189. DOI: 10.1159/000496274.
Google Scholar

15. Jensen P.. "Use of alternative medicine by patients with atopic dermatitis and psoriasis." Acta Derm Venereol, vol. 70, 1990, p. 421. DOI: 10.2340/0001555570421424.
Google Scholar

16. Liberati A., Altman D. G., Tetzlaff J... "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration." PLoS Med, vol. 6, 2009, p. e1000100. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

17. Simpson E., Eckert L., Gadkari A... "Validation of the Atopic Dermatitis Control Tool (ADCT©) using a longitudinal survey of biologic-treated patients with atopic dermatitis." BMC Dermatol, vol. 19, 2019, p. 15. DOI: 10.1186/s12895-019-0095-3.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

18. Spuls P. I., Gerbens L. A. A., Simpson E... "Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), a core instrument to measure symptoms in clinical trials: a Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) statement." Br J Dermatol, vol. 176, 2017, p. 979. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15179.
Google Scholar

19. Stalder J. F., Barbarot S., Wollenberg A... "Patient-Oriented SCORAD (PO-SCORAD): a new self-assessment scale in atopic dermatitis validated in Europe." Allergy, vol. 66, 2011, p. 1114. DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02577.x.
Google Scholar

20. Howells L. M., Chalmers J. R., Gran S... "Development and initial testing of a new instrument to measure the experience of eczema control in adults and children: Recap of atopic eczema (RECAP)." Br J Dermatol, vol. 183, 2020, p. 524. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18780.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

21. Yosipovitch G., Reaney M., Mastey V... "Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale: psychometric validation and responder definition for assessing itch in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis." Br J Dermatol, vol. 181, 2019, p. 761. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.17744.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

22. Finlay A. Y., Khan G. K.. "Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use." Clin Exp Dermatol, vol. 19, 1994, p. 210. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1994.tb01167.x.
Google Scholar

23. Silverberg J. I., Gelfand J. M., Margolis D. J... "Validation and Interpretation of Short Form 12 and Comparison with Dermatology Life Quality Index in Atopic Dermatitis in Adults." J Invest Dermatol, vol. 139, 2019, p. 2090. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2019.03.1152.
Google Scholar

24. Reich A., Heisig M., Phan N. Q... "Visual analogue scale: evaluation of the instrument for the assessment of pruritus." Acta Derm Venereol, vol. 92, 2012, p. 497. DOI: 10.2340/00015555-1265.
Google Scholar

26. Pfab F., Athanasiadis G. I., Huss-Marp J... "Effect of acupuncture on allergen-induced basophil activation in patients with atopic eczema:a pilot trial." J Altern Complement Med, vol. 17, 2011, p. 309. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2009.0684.
Google Scholar

27. Park H. J., Ahn S., Lee H., Hahm D., Kim K., Yeom M.. "Acupuncture ameliorates not only atopic dermatitis-like skin inflammation but also acute and chronic serotonergic itch possibly through blockade of 5-HT2 and 5-HT7 receptors in mice." Brain Behav Immun, vol. 93, 2021, p. 399. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2021.01.027.
Google Scholar

28. Ge W. Q., Zhan-Mu O. Y., Chen C... "Electroacupuncture reduces chronic itch via cannabinoid CB1 receptors in the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray." Front Pharmacol, vol. 13, 2022, p. 931600. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.931600.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

29. Tsai K. S., Chen Y. H., Chen H. Y... "Antipruritic effect of cold stimulation at the Quchi acupoint (LI11) in mice." BMC Complement Altern Med, vol. 14, 2014, p. 341. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-341.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

30. Park J. G., Lee H., Yeom M., Chae Y., Park H. J., Kim K.. "Effect of acupuncture treatment in patients with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis: a randomized, participant- and assessor-blind sham-controlled trial." BMC Complement Med Ther, vol. 21, 2021, p. 132. DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03306-1.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

31. Rotter G., Ahnert M. W., Geue A. V... "Acupuncture and osteopathic medicine for atopic dermatitis: a three-armed, randomized controlled explorative clinical trial." Clin Exp Dermatol, vol. 47, 2022, p. 2166. DOI: 10.1111/ced.15340.
Google Scholar

32. Carlsson C. P., Wallengren J.. "Therapeutic and experimental therapeutic studies on acupuncture and itch: review of the literature." J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, vol. 24, 2010, p. 1013. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03585.x.
Google Scholar

33. Abad-Constantino R. M. R., Caro-Chang L. M., Gatmaitan-Dumlao J. K. G., Abalos-Babaran S., Tan-Gatue P. N., Dofitas B. L.. "Acupuncture as an Adjunct to Standard Therapy for Pruritus in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: A Patient- and Assessor-blinded, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial." Acta Med Philipp, vol. 55, 2021, p. . DOI: 10.47895/amp.v55i5.3226.
Google Scholar

34. Liang Y., Jacobi H. H., Reimert C. M., Haak-Frendscho M., Marcusson J. A., Johansson O.. "CGRP-immunoreactive nerves in prurigo nodularis--an exploration of neurogenic inflammation." J Cutan Pathol, vol. 27, 2000, p. 359. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0560.2000.027007359.x.
Google Scholar

35. Johansson O., Hilliges M., Ståhle-Bäckdahl M.. "Intraepidermal neuron-specific enolase (NSE)-immunoreactive nerve fibres: evidence for sprouting in uremic patients on maintenance hemodialysis." Neurosci Lett, vol. 99, 1989, p. 281. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3940(89)90460-6.
Google Scholar

36. Springall D. R., Karanth S. S., Kirkham N., Darley C. R., Polak J. M.. "Symptoms of notalgia paresthetica may be explained by increased dermal innervation." J Invest Dermatol, vol. 97, 1991, p. 555. DOI: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12481889.
Google Scholar

37. Choragudi S., Biazus Soares G., Yosipovitch G.. "Predictive factors of quality of life in chronic pruritus patients: A cross-sectional study." JAAD Int, vol. 11, 2023, p. 65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.12.005.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

38. Vaughn A. R., Clark A. K., Sivamani R. K., Shi V. Y.. "Natural Oils for Skin-Barrier Repair: Ancient Compounds Now Backed by Modern Science." Am J Clin Dermatol, vol. 19, 2018, p. 103. DOI: 10.1007/s40257-017-0301-1.
Google Scholar

39. Goddard A. L., Lio P. A.. "Alternative, Complementary, and Forgotten Remedies for Atopic Dermatitis." Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, vol. 2015, 2015, p. 676897. DOI: .

40. Eichenfield L. F., McCollum A., Msika P.. "The benefits of sunflower oleodistillate (SOD) in pediatric dermatology." Pediatr Dermatol, vol. 26, 2009, p. 669. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.01042.x.
Google Scholar

41. Dubusquoy L., Piccardi N.. "Sunflower oleodistillate-a new natural PPAR alpha activator with anti-inflammatory properties." J At Mol Phys, vol. , 2005, p. . DOI: .

42. Varma S. R., Sivaprakasam T. O., Arumugam I... "In vitro anti-inflammatory and skin protective properties of Virgin coconut oil." Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med, vol. 9, 2019, p. 5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcme.2017.06.012.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

43. Evangelista M. T. P., Abad-Casintahan F., Lopez-Villafuerte L.. "The effect of topical virgin coconut oil on SCORAD index, transepidermal water loss, and skin capacitance in mild to moderate pediatric atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial." Int J Dermatol, vol. 53, 2014, p. 100. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12339.
Google Scholar

44. Aalto-Korte K., Pesonen M., Kuuliala O., Suuronen K.. "Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by coconut fatty acids diethanolamide." Contact Dermatitis, vol. 70, 2014, p. 169. DOI: 10.1111/cod.12151.
Google Scholar

45. Nadora D., Burney W., Chaudhuri R.K... "Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Vehicle-Controlled Study of Topical Coconut and Sunflower Seed Oil-Derived Isosorbide Diesters on Atopic Dermatitis." Dermatitis, vol. 35, 2024, p. S62. DOI: 10.1089/derm.2023.0329.
Google Scholar

46. Timoszuk M., Bielawska K., Skrzydlewska E.. "Evening Primrose (Oenothera biennis) Biological Activity Dependent on Chemical Composition." Antioxidants (Basel), vol. 7, 2018, p. . DOI: 10.3390/antiox7080108.
Google Scholar

47. Arsic A., Krstic P., Paunovic M., Nedovic J., Jakovljevic V., Vucic V.. "Anti-inflammatory effect of combining fish oil and evening primrose oil supplementation on breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial." Sci Rep, vol. 13, 2023, p. 6449. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28411-8.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

48. Chung B. Y., Park S. Y., Jung M. J., Kim H. O., Park C. W.. "Effect of Evening Primrose Oil on Korean Patients With Mild Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Study." Ann Dermatol, vol. 30, 2018, p. 409. DOI: 10.5021/ad.2018.30.4.409.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

49. Arndt J., Smith N., Tausk F.. "Stress and atopic dermatitis." Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, vol. 8, 2008, p. 312. DOI: 10.1007/s11882-008-0050-6.
Google Scholar

50. Oska C., Nakamura M.. "Alternative Psychotherapeutic Approaches to the Treatment of Eczema." Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, vol. 15, 2022, p. 2721. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S393290.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

51. Chong T. M.. "The use of hypnosis in the management of patients with cancer." Singapore Med J, vol. 9, 1968, p. 211. DOI: .

52. Rainville P., Hofbauer R. K., Bushnell M. C., Duncan G. H., Price D. D.. "Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness." J Cogn Neurosci, vol. 14, 2002, p. 887. DOI: 10.1162/089892902760191117.
Google Scholar

53. Rotter G., Teut M., Schleicher R... "Hypnotherapy, Intermittent Fasting, and Exercise Group Programs in Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Controlled Explorative Clinical Trial During the COVID-19 Pandemic." J Complement Integr Med, vol. 29, 2023, p. 99. DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0699.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

54. Stewart A.C., Thomas S.E.. "Hypnotherapy as a treatment for atopic dermatitis in adults and children." Br J Dermatol, vol. 132, 1995, p. 778. DOI: .

55. Underdown A., Barlow J., Chung V., Stewart-Brown S.. "Massage intervention for promoting mental and physical health in infants aged under six months." Cochrane Database Syst Rev, vol. , 2006, p. CD005038. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005038.pub2.
Google Scholar

56. Lin L., Yu L., Zhang S., Liu J., Xiong Y.. "The positive effect of mother-performed infant massage on infantile eczema and maternal mental state: A randomized controlled trial." Front Public Health, vol. 10, 2022, p. 1068043. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1068043.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

57. Silverberg J. I.. "Selected comorbidities of atopic dermatitis: Atopy, neuropsychiatric, and musculoskeletal disorders." Clin Dermatol, vol. 35, 2017, p. 360. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2017.03.008.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

58. Schachner L., Field T., Hernandez-Reif M., Duarte A. M., Krasnegor J.. "Atopic dermatitis symptoms decreased in children following massage therapy." Pediatr Dermatol, vol. 15, 1998, p. 390. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1998.tb01374.x.
Google Scholar

59. Tompkins R. R.. "Scholtz regimen." Arch Dermatol, vol. 114, 1978, p. 1099. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1978.01640190077043.
Google Scholar

60. Chiang C., Eichenfield L. F.. "Quantitative assessment of combination bathing and moisturizing regimens on skin hydration in atopic dermatitis." Pediatr Dermatol, vol. 26, 2009, p. 273. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00911.x.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

61. Chung K. T., Wong T. Y., Wei C. I., Huang Y. W., Lin Y.. "Tannins and human health: a review." Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, vol. 38, 1998, p. 421. DOI: 10.1080/10408699891274273.
Google Scholar

62. Karuppagounder V., Arumugam S., Thandavarayan R. A... "Tannic acid modulates NFκB signaling pathway and skin inflammation in NC/Nga mice through PPARγ expression." Cytokine, vol. 76, 2015, p. 206. DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.05.016.
Google Scholar

63. Jung M. K., Hur D. Y., Song S. B... "Tannic acid and quercetin display a therapeutic effect in atopic dermatitis via suppression of angiogenesis and TARC expression in Nc/Nga mice." J Invest Dermatol, vol. 130, 2010, p. 1459. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2009.401.
Google Scholar

64. Takahagi S., Harada N., Kamegashira A... "Randomized double-blind cross-over trial of bath additive containing tannic acid in patients with atopic dermatitis." J Cutan Immunol Allergy, vol. 3, 2020, p. 56. DOI: 10.1002/cia2.12112.
Google Scholar

65. Barnes T. M., Greive K. A.. "Topical pine tar: History, properties and use as a treatment for common skin conditions." Australas J Dermatol, vol. 58, 2017, p. 80. DOI: 10.1111/ajd.12427.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

66. Ng W. G. G., Hon K. L., Kung J. S. C... "Effect of pine-tar bath on disease severity in moderate-to-severe childhood eczema: an investigator-blinded, crossover, randomized clinical trial." J Dermatolog Treat, vol. 33, 2022, p. 157. DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1732284.
Google Scholar

67. Purnamawati S., Indrastuti N., Danarti R., Saefudin T.. "The Role of Moisturizers in Addressing Various Kinds of Dermatitis: A Review." Clin Med Res, vol. 15, 2017, p. 75. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.2017.1363.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

68. Danby S. G., Andrew P. V., Taylor R. N... "Different types of emollient cream exhibit diverse physiological effects on the skin barrier in adults with atopic dermatitis." Clin Exp Dermatol, vol. 47, 2022, p. 1154. DOI: 10.1111/ced.15141.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

69. Waked I. S., Ibrahim Z. M.. "Beneficial Effects of Paraffin Bath Therapy as Additional Treatment of Chronic Hand Eczema: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study." J Altern Complement Med, vol. 26, 2020, p. 1144. DOI: 10.1089/acm.2020.0356.
Google Scholar

70. Santer M., Ridd M. J., Francis N. A... "Emollient bath additives for the treatment of childhood eczema (BATHE): multicentre pragmatic parallel group randomised controlled trial of clinical and cost effectiveness." BMJ, vol. 361, 2018, p. k1332. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k1332.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed

71. Schäfer T.. "Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and atopic eczema." Allergol Select, vol. 1, 2017, p. 44. DOI: 10.5414/ALX01287E.
Google Scholar PubMed Central PubMed